Neural Information Processing Systems http://nips.cc/

The Job Shop Scheduling (JSS) problem can be viewed as an integer optimization program with linear objective function and linear, disjunctive constraints. Theconstraints(14c)enforceprecedencebetween tasks that must be scheduled in the specified order within their respective job. Themodel presented belowisusedtoconstruct solutions that are integral, and feasible tothe original problem constraints. However, the resolution frequency to solve OPFs is limited by their computational complexity. Additionally,the stochasticity introduced by renewable energy sources further increases the number of scenarios to consider. C.2 DatasetDetails Table 4 describes the power network benchmarks used, including the number of buses|N|, and transmission lines/transformers |E|.

Generative models at times produce "invalid" outputs, such as images with generation artifacts and unnatural sounds.

Sharp Inequalities between Total Variation and Hellinger Distances for Gaussian Mixtures Joonhyuk Jung 1 and Chao Gao 1 1 Department of Statistics, University of Chicago Abstract We study the relation between the total variation (TV) and Hellinger distances between two Gaussian location mixtures. Our first result establishes a general upper bound: for any two mixing distributions supported on a compact set, the Hellinger distance between the two mixtures is controlled by the TV distance raised to a power 1 o(1), where the o(1) term is of order 1/log log(1/TV). We also construct two sequences of mixing distributions that demonstrate the sharpness of this bound. Taken together, our results resolve an open problem raised in Jia et al. (2023) and thus lead to an entropic characterization of learning Gaussian mixtures in total variation. Our inequality also yields optimal robust estimation of Gaussian mixtures in Hellinger distance, which has a direct implication for bounding the minimax regret of empirical Bayes under Huber contamination. 1 Introduction The Gaussian location mixture is one of the most fundamental models used in nonparametric density estimation, Bayesian inference, and clustering (Lindsay, 1995; Dasgupta, 1999). Given a probability measure π supported on R d, the induced Gaussian mixture is defined by f π(x) = null R dϕ d(x θ)dπ(θ), where ϕ d(x) = (2π) d/2 exp( x 2 2/2) is the density function of the d-dimensional standard Gaussian distribution. In this paper, we study the relation between the total variation distance TV(p,q):= 1 2 null |p q| and the Hellinger distance H(p,q):= null 1 2 null ( p q) 2 of two Gaussian mixture densities.

This paper establishes a rigorous theoretical foundation for the function class implicitly learned by XGBoost, bridging the gap between its empirical success and our theoretical understanding. We introduce an infinite-dimensional function class $\mathcal{F}^{d, s}_{\infty-\text{ST}}$ that extends finite ensembles of bounded-depth regression trees, together with a complexity measure $V^{d, s}_{\infty-\text{XGB}}(\cdot)$ that generalizes the $L^1$ regularization penalty used in XGBoost. We show that every optimizer of the XGBoost objective is also an optimizer of an equivalent penalized regression problem over $\mathcal{F}^{d, s}_{\infty-\text{ST}}$ with penalty $V^{d, s}_{\infty-\text{XGB}}(\cdot)$, providing an interpretation of XGBoost as implicitly targeting a broader function class. We also develop a smoothness-based interpretation of $\mathcal{F}^{d, s}_{\infty-\text{ST}}$ and $V^{d, s}_{\infty-\text{XGB}}(\cdot)$ in terms of Hardy--Krause variation. We prove that the least squares estimator over $\{f \in \mathcal{F}^{d, s}_{\infty-\text{ST}}: V^{d, s}_{\infty-\text{XGB}}(f) \le V\}$ achieves a nearly minimax-optimal rate of convergence $n^{-2/3} (\log n)^{4(\min(s, d) - 1)/3}$, thereby avoiding the curse of dimensionality. Our results provide the first rigorous characterization of the function space underlying XGBoost, clarify its connection to classical notions of variation, and identify an important open problem: whether the XGBoost algorithm itself achieves minimax optimality over this class.

We study when geometric simplicity of decision boundaries, used here as a notion of interpretability, can conflict with accurate approximation of axis-aligned decision trees by shallow neural networks. Decision trees induce rule-based, axis-aligned decision regions (finite unions of boxes), whereas shallow ReLU networks are typically trained as score models whose predictions are obtained by thresholding. We analyze the infinite-width, bounded-norm, single-hidden-layer ReLU class through the Radon total variation ($\mathrm{R}\mathrm{TV}$) seminorm, which controls the geometric complexity of level sets. We first show that the hard tree indicator $1_A$ has infinite $\mathrm{R}\mathrm{TV}$. Moreover, two natural split-wise continuous surrogates--piecewise-linear ramp smoothing and sigmoidal (logistic) smoothing--also have infinite $\mathrm{R}\mathrm{TV}$ in dimensions $d>1$, while Gaussian convolution yields finite $\mathrm{R}\mathrm{TV}$ but with an explicit exponential dependence on $d$. We then separate two goals that are often conflated: classification after thresholding (recovering the decision set) versus score learning (learning a calibrated score close to $1_A$). For classification, we construct a smooth barrier score $S_A$ with finite $\mathrm{R}\mathrm{TV}$ whose fixed threshold $τ=1$ exactly recovers the box. Under a mild tube-mass condition near $\partial A$, we prove an $L_1(P)$ calibration bound that decays polynomially in a sharpness parameter, along with an explicit $\mathrm{R}\mathrm{TV}$ upper bound in terms of face measures. Experiments on synthetic unions of rectangles illustrate the resulting accuracy--complexity tradeoff and how threshold selection shifts where training lands along it.

A conditional generative model is a method for sampling from a conditional distribution $p(y \mid x)$. For example, one may want to sample an image of a cat given the label ``cat''. A feed-forward conditional generative model is a function $g(x, z)$ that takes the input $x$ and a random seed $z$, and outputs a sample $y$ from $p(y \mid x)$. Ideally the distribution of outputs $(x, g(x, z))$ would be close in total variation to the ideal distribution $(x, y)$.Generalization bounds for other learning models require assumptions on the distribution of $x$, even in simple settings like linear regression with Gaussian noise. We show these assumptions are unnecessary in our model, for both linear regression and single-layer ReLU networks. Given samples $(x, y)$, we show how to learn a 1-layer ReLU conditional generative model in total variation. As our result has no assumption on the distribution of inputs $x$, if we are given access to the internal activations of a deep generative model, we can compose our 1-layer guarantee to progressively learn the deep model using a near-linear number of samples.